Durnell v. Durnell
Inclusion of A/R as a business asset (vocational rehabilitation counselor) is affirmed – court refuses to adopt bright line rule.
Sharon v. Sharon
No abuse of discretion in treating accounts receivable as an asset.
Hubert v. Hubert
Court properly exercised discretion by treating A/R of husband’s medical practice as income, rather than as property. They cannot be counted as both.
Hauge v. Hauge
No error in including A/R as asset of dental practice where the amount remained relatively static and they were not included as part of H’s income.
Ondrasek v. Ondrasek
A\R are assets of the service corp. unless excluded by withdrawal agreement. However, double counting of A/R is error.
Weiss v. Weiss
Accounts receivable and secured accounts receivable were improperly excluded from marital estate.
Johnson v. Johnson
Because receivables were viewed as salary, it would have been error to include them in the assets available for distribution.
Turner v. Turner
Value of orthopedic surgery practice included accounts receivable as husband would continue to generate them as long as he practiced medicine.
Venter v. Venter
Inclusion of A/R as a business asset (vocational rehabilitation counselor) is affirmed – court refuses to adopt bright line rule.