Category Archives: Removal of Child

Alvarez v. Veliz

While father’s intent to move to Washington was not unreasonable as it would allow him to pursue his best career options in the navy, the removal of the children from Wisconsin to Washington was unreasonable and not in their best interests.

Year: 2015 | State: WI

Shulka v. Sikraji

Trial court properly ordered mother to return to Wisconsin after she moved to area and school district other than the one she had designated in her petition for removal.

Year: 2014 | State: WI

Derleth v. Cordova

Circuit court had no authority to prospectively order that Wife not move beyond forty-five miles from the marital home. By its enactment of Wis. Stat. § 767.481, the legislature has made a judgment that moves of less than 150 miles are not subject to the best interests of the children standard.

Year: 2013 | State: WI

Warner v. Warner

150 miles is measured by “ordinary routes of travel,” not “as the crow flies.” (Not Published; Cannot Be Cited.)

Year: 2008 | State: WI

In Re Marriage of Hughes v. Hughes

Trial court properly applied §767.325 where mother brought removal action and father countered with motion to change placement. Once father filed a motion to modify placement based on circumstances other than the move, the court can consider all relevant circumstances, including but limited to the move in deciding whether to modify placement.

Year: 1998 | State: WI

In Re Marriage of Kerkvliet v. Kerkvliet

Removal statute is directed to determine whether physical placement should be transferred – not whether custodial parent has right to move.

Year: 1992 | State: WI

Marriage of Long v. Long

A finding that a removal is against the child’s best interests must rest on more than a determination that removal will in some way change the visitation arrangements or change the child’s relationship with the noncustodial parent. The court must make a finding that removal will significantly harm or impede the child’s relationship with the noncustodial parent and that this harm will work to the child’s detriment.

Year: 1986 | State: WI

Matter of Tropea v. Tropea

Court is to determine removal by considering all evidence to determine whether proposed relocation would serve child’s best interest.

Year: 1996 | State: NY

In Re Parenting of M.C.

Constitutional right to travel is restricted by the compelling state interests of the best interests of children.

Year: 2015 | State: MT

Burgess v. Burgess

Parent seeking to relocate does not have to prove that move is necessary as condition of custody if prejudgment or in order to move if after custody order is in effect.

Year: 1996 | State: CA