Derleth v. Cordova
Trial court reversed for not valuing the unvested portions of husband’s retirement plan where it was due to vest two weeks after the final hearing.
In Re Marriage of Mack v. Mack
Court must consider unvested pension plan.
Heatwole v. Heatwole
Court has discretion in whether or not to consider non-vested pension rights.
Leighton v. Leighton
Trial court should consider unvested interest In Retirement plan. The fact that the interest is contingent does not mean that it can be ignored.
Whitfield v. Whitfield
Colorado adopts majority rule that non-vested military pension is divisible marital property to the extent that it was earned during the marriage.
In Re Marriage of Preston
Only vested pensions are includable in marital estate.
In Re Marriage of Beckman
Colorado adopts majority rule that non-vested military pension is divisible marital property to the extent that it was earned during the marriage.