In Re Marriage of Hubert v. Hubert


159 Wis.2d 803, 465 N.W.2d 252 (WI Ct. App., 1990)


(1) Court failed to individualize high standard of living. (2) Court erred in failing to consider wife’s savings and investment plans in her budget. (3) Court failed to consider wife’s non-economic contributions to the marriage. (4) Wife entitled to share in good fortune and elevated income. (5) Court must start maintenance analysis with 50-50 division of income.

[ Full Opinion ]