Cite
2007 WI App 171, 304 Wis. 2d 449, 737 N.W.2d 5 (WI Ct. App., 2007)
Summary
While financial changes occurred since the original maintenance order, the changes were not substantial. Termination of child support was not a substantial change, since it was anticipated that it would end and child support was not for the wife, but for the child. [Although not expressly stated in the case, the holding means that if there is a disparity between the court’s oral comments and the written judgment, the written judgement controls.]
[ Full Opinion ]