In Re Marriage of Spindler v. Spindler

Cite

207 Wis. 2d 329, 558 N.W.2d 645 (WI Ct. App., 1996)

Summary

Simply because wife did routine maintenance on cottage inherited by husband is not enough to conclude that its character changed. Also. there must be more than spending marital funds for routine maintenance. The trial court must determine whether the non-owning spouse’s efforts constituted improvements.

[ Full Opinion ]