Kim v. Kim

Cite

2020-Ohio-22, 2020, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth District, Summit County (2020)

Summary

No error to use actual average income rather than normalized income when calculating spousal support. Doing so did not result in an “inequitable ‘double dip.’” The applicable statute “precludes an outright prohibition of double dipping” and that the trial court should, “in the interest of equity,” consider the impact of double dipping to avoid unfairness. Here, the trial court cited specific circumstances that were “overriding the unfairness in double dipping.”

[ Full Opinion ]